Empiric Social Research
|
|
Qualitative or Quantitative? |
|
Both methods have different advantages and disadvantages. In many cases, a combination of the two is most sensible.
The application of qualitative methods is recommended
- when little knowledge of the research subject or context is available
- to validate previously made decisions after the fact
- to strengthen interpretations of quantitative data for the development of optimal quantitative questionnaires
Qualitative Analyses
- can be developed relatively quickly, but require a lot of time and effort to be carried out and analyzed
- are characterized by their openness and flexibility
- contain a high level of authenticity and consideration of culturally appropriate styles
- can be “playful” and so are less stressful for children
- can be carried out with a relatively small sample
- are suited to exploration, hypothesis formation and the discovery of new facts
The application of quantitative methods is recommended
- when representative and reliable findings are essential
- when comparisons at the group level (aggregate level) are being made
- when causal relationships are to be identified
- when statistical correlations need to be determined
Quantitative Analyses
- are efficiently carried out and evaluated, but difficult to construct
- deliver exact quantifiable results
- are characterized by a high standardization, objectivity and comparability
- allow for generalization of the total examined population
- need relatively large samples
- are suited to testing hypotheses
|